Waste of time
If developers are stuck on test tasks, no value-adding features can be (further) developed in that time.
AI-generated
Your Devs are spending their time repeatedly klicking around? What if that time could be free again – Without compromising Quality?
Automate your expensive Regression Test and run it any time without human interaction
E2E Test Automation
The Challenge
Inefficient
Not only is the time lost, it is also badly spent! A development team's strength lies in development, not in testing. It would be asking too much to expect the results of a qualified specialist.
Human error
Inaccuracies can occur, especially under high time pressure, which in the worst case can lead to an error being overlooked in the test, which later costs a lot of money.
Scaling Problems
Development time is the most precious resource in any dev team because I can't scale it at will. A team of five developers can do no less than one in ten - often the exact opposite is the case. Every wrongly invested minute therefore results in a real loss of productivity.
Problems during Presentation
Venture capital is a matter of trust. If the test is not thorough enough, in the worst case scenario the product can fail during the presentation to the investors - not necessarily the image you want to convey.
Get Time back you want to invest smarter
Get flexibility back, let the computer do the things it can do better than humans anyway: With a smart automation solution.
Test automation is incorruptible, it works day and night and can immediately create real security for even the smallest change in the code by validating it. This means that errors, which strangely enough keep coming back without anyone knowing why, are finally a thing of the past.
The time that this frees up can be invested in features that stakeholders love and users love - with INCREASING quality!
As soon as it is possible to take over maintenance internally, I hand over the code completely - and even offer a handover so that speed is not affected at any time.
Schedule Call
Gather Requirements
Automated Tests
Receive Code
The Safety of a complete Regression Test At any Time – Also at Night
We start flexibly and begin with the foundation: A test framework in the programming language that is currently being used. This ensures internal maintainability as soon as the corresponding capacity is available.
From month to month, we decide which test cases should become part of the regression test and thus effectively create exactly the coverage that is required - while at the same time building up internal knowledge.
Time saving
The development team is no longer required to carry out tests and can work on the actual product in the time saved.
Efficiency
Automation can run not just once a week, but EVERY time - computers don't get tired, don't know when to stop working or go on vacation. Exactly the tester you want.
Conserve internal resources
No internal resources are required for either the implementation or the development of the test. I take care of the implementation, the computer takes care of the execution.
Adoptable at any time
The code I write always adheres to the team's standards. This ensures that it can be taken over when the time is right.
Reliable when it counts
Regular testing means that a botched pitch is a thing of the past. A product that is tested so thoroughly and continuously is as unlikely as possible to stop working at the wrong moment.
What it’s about
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I enter a subscription by booking this?
Yes, this support is a subscription that covers the basic costs of maintaining the tests. This ensures that the automation delivers added value at all times instead of standing in the way.
How quickly can we start?
Depending on my availability, we can start within the same week. I am aware of the speed in which the market moves. Without being an exception.
Does this include complete coverage?
We decide together which test coverage makes sense. This decision must be made on a case-by-case basis and is highly product-dependent.
Ist Test Automation alone sufficient?
Every new change should also be checked by a human to ensure that visual errors are also found. This is not the strength of test automation, which shows its strengths primarily in functional tests.
How should that ever work?
We start with a thorough analysis of the product, the target group and the objectives. With a sense of proportion and the experience of over 10 years of quality assurance, I make a recommendation on the appropriate test coverage, which we then strive to achieve together. Intervention or correction is possible at any time - I give a satisfaction guarantee on this.
Are YOU able to do this?
With a Guarantee of Satisfaction. I have more than ten years of experience in quality assurance - acquired in well-known companies. You can find out more in my profile and in my references.
AI-generated
I am Max and since more than a decade I find Bugs that cost you a lot of money.